digital art article 8 reviews of mice

zinn60075 April 18, 2023 Comment

Is no longer supporting older versions of your web browser in order to ensure that user data remains secure. Please update to the latest version.

Purchase Protection: Shop confidently on knowing if something goes wrong with an order, we've got your back for all eligible purchases — see programme terms

Bride of Frankenstein / 8 x 10 matte art print / Halloween / Spooky / Classic Horror / Horror / Frankenstein / Digital art

Of Mice And Men By John Steinbeck

Foxin / 8 x 10 matte art print / Dark art / Fox / Skull / Creepy / Morbid / Mixed media / Colored Pencil and Digital

Lavender / 5 x 7 matte art print / Dark art / Creepy / Raven / Lavender / Witchy / Digital art ad vertisement by akayoart Ad vertisement from shop akayoart akayoart From shop akayoart £ 15.17

Scavenger / 8 x 10 matte art print / Dark art / Creepy / Morbid / Raccoon / Birds / Digital art ad vertisement by akayoart Ad vertisement from shop akayoart akayoart From shop akayoart £ 20.22

Pocket Mouse Digital Art

Bat-urday/ 8 x 10 matte art print/ Bat/ Butterflies/ Dark art/ Witchy/ Creepy/ Digital art ad vertisement by akayoart Ad vertisement from shop akayoart akayoart From shop akayoart £ 20.22

Inhabited / 8 x 10 matte art print / Dark art / Creepy / Creepy cute / Cat / Bird skull / Horror / Digital art ad vertisement by akayoart Ad vertisement from shop akayoart akayoart From shop akayoart £ 20.22

Foxed/ 5 x 7 matte art print / Dark art / Fox / Creepy / Spooky / Fox Skull / Colored Pencil ad vertisement by akayoart Ad vertisement from shop akayoart akayoart From shop akayoart £ 15.17

Eureka Mickey Mouse Clubhouse Primary Colors Computer Paper 8 1/2 X 11 (eu 812117), 1

SPIDER BUNDLE/ (3) 8 x 10 matte art prints/ The Web/ Spider/ The Widow ad vertisement by akayoart Ad vertisement from shop akayoart akayoart From shop akayoart £ 50.54

Keep collections to yourself or inspire other shoppers! Keep in mind that anyone can view public collections - they may also appear in recommendations and other places. View ’s Privacy Policy

In order to give you the best experience, we use cookies and similar technologies for performance, analytics, personalisation, advertising, and to help our site function. Want to know more? Read our Cookie Policy. You can change your preferences any time in your Privacy Settings.

Tech Taffy Dust Devouring Compound

Some of the technologies we use are necessary for critical functions like security and site integrity, account authentication, security and privacy preferences, internal site usage and maintenance data, and to make the site work correctly for browsing and transactions.

Without these technologies, things like personalised recommendations, your account preferences, or localisation may not work correctly. Find out more in our Cookies & Similar Technologies Policy.

To enable personalised advertising (like interest-based ads), we may share your data with our marketing and advertising partners using cookies and other technologies. Those partners may have their own information they’ve collected about you. Turning off the personalised advertising setting won’t stop you from seeing ads or impact 's own personalisation technologies, but it may make the ads you see less relevant or more repetitive.

Amazon.com: Large Gaming Mouse Pad Extended Desk Mat 31.5x11.8 In Mouse Pad Non Slip Rubber Base Keyboard Pad Waterproof Desktop Mat For Laptop Computer Work Game Home Office Geometric Art

This type of data sharing may be considered a “sale” of information under California privacy laws. Turning off personalised advertising opts you out of these “sales”. Learn more in our Privacy Policy, Help Centre, and Cookies & Similar Technologies Policy.Background: Psychotherapy interventions increasingly utilize digital technologies to improve access to therapy and its acceptability. Opportunities that digital technology potentially creates for art therapy reach beyond increased access to include new possibilities of adaptation and extension of therapy tool box. Given growing interest in practice and research in this area, it is important to investigate how art therapists engage with digital technology or how (and whether) practice might be safely adapted to include new potential modes of delivery and new arts media.

Methods: An integrative review of peer-reviewed literature on the use of digital technology in art therapy was conducted. The methodology used is particularly well suited for early stage exploratory inquiries, allowing for close examination of papers from a variety of methodological paradigms. Only studies that presented empirical outcomes were included in the formal analysis.

Findings: Over 400 records were screened and 12 studies were included in the synthesis, pertaining to both the use of digital technology for remote delivery and as a medium for art making. Included studies, adopting predominantly qualitative and mixed methods, are grouped according to their focus on: art therapists’ views and experiences, online/distance art therapy, and the use of digital arts media. Recurring themes are discussed, including potential benefits and risks of incorporating digital technology in sessions with clients, concerns relating to ethics, resistance toward digital arts media, technological limitations and implications for therapeutic relationship and therapy process. Propositions for best practice and technological innovations that could make some of the challenges redundant are also reviewed. Future directions in research are indicated and cautious openness is recommended in both research and practice.

Art Inspired By Mouse, Ink And Sepia On Paper, Japan, 19th Century, Edo Period, 7 1/2 X 6 3/8 In., 19.1 X 16.2 Cm, Classic Works Modernized By Artotop With A Splash

Conclusion: The review documents growing research illustrating increased use of digital technology by art therapists for both online delivery and digital art making. Potentially immense opportunities that technology brings for art therapy should be considered alongside limitations and challenges of clinical, pragmatic and ethical nature. The review aims to invite conversations and further research to explore ways in which technology could increase relevance and reach of art therapy without compromising clients’ safety and key principles of the profession.

Digital technology is increasingly present in psychotherapy practice worldwide, enabling clients and therapists to connect remotely. This way of improving access to therapy is important for those who might not otherwise be able to benefit from treatment due to living in more remote locations or having disabilities or mobility problems preventing them to attend therapy sessions in person. Despite this general trend of expansion in telehealth provision, to include also psychotherapy services, relatively little is known about its use within art therapy practice (Choe, 2014; Levy et al., 2018). Research in the area focuses primarily on verbal therapies and more specifically on cognitive-behavioral therapy conducted online (Hedman et al., 2012; Saddichha et al., 2014; Vigerland et al., 2016) with some notable examples of work highlighting issues key to psychodynamic psychotherapy (De Bitencourt Machado et al., 2016; Feijó et al., 2018).

Art therapists support clients in engaging in creative processes to improve their psychological wellbeing. Due to incorporating art making within therapy process and the key role of triangular therapeutic relationship between the therapist, the client and the artwork (Schaverien, 2000; Gussak and Rosal, 2016), art therapy practice is arguably more difficult to translate to online situations. However, suggestions have also been made that art therapy is particularly well suited to distance delivery, partially due to increasing ease of sharing images via online channels and non-reliance on verbal communication, and also due to dealing with symbols, metaphors and projections, which can manifest irrespective of medium used (McNiff, 1999; Austin, 2009).

Comparative Cellular Analysis Of Motor Cortex In Human, Marmoset And Mouse

Art therapy profession has not entered the digital world only recently. In fact, it has been critically engaged in often difficult discussions on the risks and potential of digital technology for art therapy practice for over three decades (Weinberg, 1985; Canter, 1987, 1989; Johnson, 1987). Back in 1999 the Art Therapy Journal dedicated a special issue to the links between computer technology and art therapy and has repeated a similar issue a decade later. In 2019, the Journal asked therapists and researchers to consider ways in which professional assumptions can be updated, modernized or reframed to meet contemporary needs.

The use of digital technology in art therapy is not limited to online communication tools but extends to the application of digital media for the purpose of art making, equally relevant to face-to-face practice. While distance art therapy could potentially widen the reach of therapy to include new groups of clients, expanding the range of therapeutic tools to include digital arts media might extend art therapy toolbox to widen access for those clients who might not otherwise engage in traditional art materials for a variety of reasons.

However, it has been argued that the process of digital media adoption in art therapy is slow (Carlton, 2014; Choe, 2014) and resistance to digital technology as well as concerns about the use of digital tools for art making in therapy have been reported in literature (Kuleba, 2008; Klorer, 2009; Potash, 2009). It has been even implied that art therapists themselves may be more conservative and hesitant in their use of digital media than their clients (McNiff, 1999; Peterson et al., 2005; Carlton, 2014). This cautiousness is stipulated to be informed by a heightened sense of responsibility for clients’ safety and wellbeing (Orr, 2016). Art therapists’ own emotional factors and biases were cited to be important barriers to adoption of technology (Asawa, 2009) while it has been suggested that therapists experience “conflict between the desire to promote art therapy and engage in technology and the desire to remain loyal to the field’s origins in traditional methods of communication and art media” (Asawa, 2009, p. 58).